It seems like some sort of a sick joke or a gotcha or a "well ackshually" moment that all things that vary over time hide within themselves a completely static structure. It is the truth's way of humbling those who think they're better than others just because they've learned to embrace transience. It is also a hint towards a realization of a truth-seeker's version of object permanence - that things don't stop existing just because you cannot observe them. And yeah, I'm on the side of this contrarian asshole.
Imagine it like this:
Let T_l,b be an ordered set of all signals of length n of values encoded in b bits. T can be represented as a matrix of l^(2^b) rows and l columns.
For each matrix T_l,b, we can find the same-sized matrix FR_l,b consisting of the real parts of the frequency-domain representations of rows of T_l,b, and FI_l,b, consisting of the imaginary parts.
Now scale l and b to infinity. The tuple we get, (T, FR, FI), is our dictionary of the proof of permanence and staticity of all things that appear transient and dynamic.
* This goes nowhere
No comments:
Post a Comment